Nigerian vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Nigerian
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Nigerians
Chickasaw
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,578,519 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 41.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nigerian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.62% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 15.2% |
| Range | 13.4% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Barbadians | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Portuguese | 4.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 3.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French Canadians | 3.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |