Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,580,502 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 51.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 6.4% | 15.2% |
| Range | 5.8% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 5.4% |
| Median | 1.9% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |