Japanese vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
 Chickasaw
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Japanese
Chickasaw
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 34.6%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Chickasaw | 
| Minimum | 0.43% | 0.33% | 
| Maximum | 14.1% | 15.2% | 
| Range | 13.7% | 14.8% | 
| Mean | 3.6% | 5.4% | 
| Median | 2.8% | 4.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 6.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.8% | 
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 3.4%  |