Houma vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Houma
Creek
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,790,703 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 7.4%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Creek |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 9.0% | 11.5% |
Range | 7.8% | 10.8% |
Mean | 3.8% | 4.5% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |