Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,518,838 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 51.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 15.6% | 15.2% |
| Range | 15.3% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.0% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Immigrants from Venezuela (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |