Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Chickasaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,180,438 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 44.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 5.1% | 15.2% |
| Range | 4.9% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |