Native/Alaskan vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
 Chickasaw
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Chickasaw
3.0%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,205,418 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 7.1%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Chickasaw | 
| Minimum | 0.86% | 0.33% | 
| Maximum | 9.3% | 15.2% | 
| Range | 8.5% | 14.8% | 
| Mean | 4.0% | 5.4% | 
| Median | 3.7% | 4.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 6.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Yuman (3.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Apache (3.0%, a difference of 0.74%), Spanish American (2.9%, a difference of 0.80%), Colville (3.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and Cherokee (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 2.9%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 2.9%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 2.9%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 2.9%  | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 2.9%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 3.3%  |