Laotian vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Laotians
Chickasaw
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,815,117 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 59.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 7.1% | 15.2% |
| Range | 6.5% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 5.4% |
| Median | 1.9% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |