Houma vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Houma
Choctaw
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,790,703 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 4.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Choctaw |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.24% |
Maximum | 9.0% | 15.8% |
Range | 7.8% | 15.5% |
Mean | 3.8% | 6.0% |
Median | 3.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |