Ugandan vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,002,961 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 52.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.51% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 7.2% | 15.2% |
| Range | 6.7% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.0% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |