Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Chickasaw
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,311,992 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 56.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North Macedonia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.85% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 5.9% | 15.2% |
| Range | 5.0% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 5.4% |
| Median | 1.9% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.75% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Palestinian (2.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Paraguayan (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |