Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Subsaharan African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Zimbabweans
Sub-Saharan Africans
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,014,655 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 35.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.49% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 37.8% |
Range | 37.0% | 35.0% |
Mean | 6.6% | 14.2% |
Median | 5.6% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Hispanic or Latino (9.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (9.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Laotians | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 97.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Delaware | 97.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 95.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and African (12.3%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |