Pima vs Sioux Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Pima
Sioux
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Pima
Sioux
8.3%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Sioux Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,468,646 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,900,714 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Sioux |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 37.7% | 77.3% |
| Range | 34.0% | 76.9% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 18.8% |
| Median | 10.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 26.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 21.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Sioux by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tsimshian (8.5%, a difference of 2.3%), Alaska Native (8.1%, a difference of 2.4%), Pueblo (8.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Yuman (8.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and Puerto Rican (8.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Tsimshian (8.5%, a difference of 0.97%), Pueblo (8.5%, a difference of 1.0%), Yuman (8.6%, a difference of 2.4%), Puerto Rican (8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and Apache (8.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 10.2% |