Pima vs Sioux In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Pima
Sioux
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Pima
Sioux
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Sioux In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,072,286 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Sioux |
Minimum | 46.4% | 27.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.6% | 72.4% |
Mean | 79.8% | 76.6% |
Median | 81.6% | 78.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.6% | 67.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.0% | 88.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 20.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 17.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Sioux by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Creek (80.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Colville (80.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Houma (79.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Seminole (80.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |