Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,412,479 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.625. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.661% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 660.8 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 26.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $53,974, a difference of 16.6%), and median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $51,793, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $40,340, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $52,986, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $94,867, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 51.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 46.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.28%), single female poverty (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.2%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 29.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.5%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.92%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.1%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 63.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.76%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.4%).