Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Tohono O'odham
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Tohono O'odham
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,865,083 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,714,537 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 38.9%.
![Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/guamanians-chamorros-vs-tohono-o-odham-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 2.8% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 17.3% | 37.8% |
Range | 14.4% | 37.5% |
Mean | 7.3% | 12.1% |
Median | 6.3% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |