Chickasaw vs Danish Average Family Size
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Danish
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Chickasaw
Danes
3.19
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
6.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.17
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
2.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Danish Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 3.19. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,910,461 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Danes and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.444 and weighted average of 3.17, a difference of 0.43%.

Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Danish |
Minimum | 2.14 | 1.52 |
Maximum | 4.35 | 4.69 |
Range | 2.21 | 3.17 |
Mean | 3.19 | 3.03 |
Median | 3.16 | 3.12 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.04 | 2.69 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.32 | 3.42 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.28 | 0.73 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.38 | 0.67 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.37 | 0.66 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Danes by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Portuguese (3.19, a difference of 0.0%), Nonimmigrants (3.19, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Italy (3.19, a difference of 0.060%), Icelander (3.19, a difference of 0.080%), and Basque (3.19, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Brazil (3.18, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (3.18, a difference of 0.070%), Hungarian (3.18, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.18, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Japan (3.18, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Chickasaw | 6.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.19 |
Portuguese | 6.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.19 |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.19 |
Basques | 5.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.19 |
Cherokee | 4.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.18 |
Brazilians | 4.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.18 |
Iranians | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Turkey | 4.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Romania | 3.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.18 |
Romanians | 3.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.18 |
Houma | 3.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.18 |
Osage | 3.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Japan | 3.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.18 |
Hungarians | 3.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Moldova | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 2.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Brazil | 2.7 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.18 |
Danes | 2.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.17 |