British vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from Oceania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
British
Immigrants from Oceania
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 0.87% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 20.2% |
| Range | 99.1% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 8.5% |
| Median | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to British by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |