Slavic vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Chinese
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
40.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,477,501 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 30.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Chinese |
| Minimum | 10.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 89.1% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 35.9% | 16.1% |
| Median | 23.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.5% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.7% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.8% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and British (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |