Iranian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Chinese
18.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,309,917 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 11.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 41.3% | 43.0% |
| Range | 38.0% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 16.1% |
| Median | 16.7% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |