Palestinian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Chinese
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,894,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 19.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 53.6% | 43.0% |
Range | 51.0% | 41.7% |
Mean | 21.7% | 16.1% |
Median | 19.1% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.9% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Cypriot (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Laotian (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |