Bermudan vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bermudan
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bermudans
Chinese
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,621,982 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 38.0%.
![Bermudan vs Chinese Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/bermudans-vs-chinese-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 61.7% | 43.0% |
Range | 59.1% | 41.7% |
Mean | 22.9% | 16.1% |
Median | 21.5% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.070%), West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |