Greek vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Chinese
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,908,481 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 20.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Greek | Chinese |
Minimum | 10.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 76.9% | 43.0% |
Range | 66.9% | 41.7% |
Mean | 26.2% | 16.1% |
Median | 18.9% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.5% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Greeks by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Albania (19.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |