Eastern European vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Eastern European
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Chinese
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,870,617 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 18.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Chinese |
Minimum | 4.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
Range | 96.0% | 41.7% |
Mean | 25.3% | 16.1% |
Median | 17.2% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.6% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |