African vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
African
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Africans
Chinese
24.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,525,497 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 24.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 53.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | African | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 60.3% | 43.0% |
Range | 58.4% | 41.7% |
Mean | 28.3% | 16.1% |
Median | 27.0% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.6% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Central America (24.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Yaqui (24.9%, a difference of 0.48%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and American (24.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |