Colville vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Colville
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Colville
Chinese
29.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,604,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388 and weighted average of 29.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 80.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colville | Chinese |
Minimum | 16.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 73.3% | 43.0% |
Range | 56.6% | 41.7% |
Mean | 34.2% | 16.1% |
Median | 32.4% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.8% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.2% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Colville by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |