Canadian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Chinese
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,352,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 30.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 13.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 86.4% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 39.9% | 16.1% |
| Median | 32.8% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.0% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.1% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.080%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |