Scotch-Irish vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Chinese
22.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,342,644 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 22.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 42.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Chinese |
| Minimum | 8.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 91.9% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 41.2% | 16.1% |
| Median | 36.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.6% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.6% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.8% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.5% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.24%), British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |