Nigerian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nigerian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Nigerians
Chinese
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
20.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,209,143 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 32.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nigerian | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 43.0% |
Range | 46.7% | 41.7% |
Mean | 20.7% | 16.1% |
Median | 20.5% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Kenya (21.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |