Laotian vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Laotians
Chippewa
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,814,363 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 25.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 11.4% | 20.9% |
| Range | 10.4% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 9.1% |
| Median | 6.2% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |