Immigrants from Indonesia vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Tsimshian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Tsimshian
18.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,892,292 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.823 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 0.97%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 9.1% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 41.7% |
Range | 90.9% | 37.1% |
Mean | 24.9% | 23.7% |
Median | 18.5% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Tsimshian by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |