Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Chickasaw
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,174,620 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 65.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 1.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 35.3% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 91.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.4% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 66.6% | 67.1% |
| Median | 67.1% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), European (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Alaska Native (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |