Immigrants from Guatemala vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Bhutanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Bhutanese
24.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,364,568 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 24.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 36.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 90.5% | 41.4% |
Range | 87.4% | 40.1% |
Mean | 32.5% | 15.9% |
Median | 27.7% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.1% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.21%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |