Hmong vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Hmong
Chickasaw
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,669,739 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 14.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hmong | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 38.6% |
| Range | 30.8% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 13.9% | 18.1% |
| Median | 13.2% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (13.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |