Hmong vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Hmong
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Hmong
Chickasaw
82.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,669,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 82.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,707,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 80.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 54.9% | 39.0% |
Maximum | 97.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.5% | 61.0% |
Mean | 83.6% | 77.5% |
Median | 83.7% | 78.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 80.7% | 73.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.4% | 82.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Hmong by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Mexican American Indian (82.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (82.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (82.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American Indian (82.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (82.7%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 82.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 82.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.8% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.6% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 82.5% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 82.5% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 82.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 82.4% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 82.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |