Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Chickasaw
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,861,278 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 29.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 30.2% | 38.6% |
| Range | 29.7% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 18.1% |
| Median | 10.3% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |