Hmong vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Hmong
Chickasaw
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Hmong
Chickasaw
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,311,251 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,812,598 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 12.0%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.80% | 0.98% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 36.2% |
Range | 13.2% | 35.2% |
Mean | 5.1% | 9.5% |
Median | 4.5% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Chinese (4.4%, a difference of 5.7%), Fijian (4.5%, a difference of 7.3%), Tsimshian (4.6%, a difference of 8.9%), Sudanese (4.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Comanche (4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |