Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Chickasaw
13.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
43.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,642,339 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 17.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 33.5% | 38.6% |
| Range | 32.0% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 18.1% |
| Median | 11.8% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Kenyan (13.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cameroon (13.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Venezuelan (13.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (13.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and South American (13.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
| South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
| Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
| Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 41.5 /100 | #186 | Average 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 41.0 /100 | #187 | Average 13.6% |
| Hawaiians | 39.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 13.6% |
| Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |