Comanche vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Chickasaw
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,749,855 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2b50/c2b5004951597148fda500f07dd4938923a5b278" alt="Comanche vs Chickasaw Female Poverty"
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 8.4% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 38.6% |
Range | 51.6% | 36.7% |
Mean | 20.0% | 18.1% |
Median | 17.4% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |