Canadian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Chickasaw
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,154,651 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 25.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 38.6% |
| Range | 97.3% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 30.0% | 18.1% |
| Median | 16.8% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.0% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.7% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.4% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Puget Sound Salish (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |