Laotian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Laotian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Laotians
Chickasaw
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,727,554 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 26.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 38.6% |
| Range | 22.8% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 10.9% | 18.1% |
| Median | 11.4% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |