Austrian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Austrian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Austrians
Chickasaw
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,657,404 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 30.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Austrian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 38.6% |
Range | 96.7% | 36.7% |
Mean | 28.2% | 18.1% |
Median | 16.5% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.5% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Austrians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |