Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Chickasaw
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
28.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,969,010 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 15.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 39.4% | 38.6% |
Range | 37.3% | 36.7% |
Mean | 14.4% | 18.1% |
Median | 12.9% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.010%), South American Indian (13.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (13.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |