Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
Chickasaw
11.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,294,080 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 43.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 21.5% | 38.6% |
| Range | 21.1% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 18.1% |
| Median | 9.5% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 0.75%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |