Hmong vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
 Immigrants from Hong Kong
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Hmong
Immigrants from Hong Kong
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,669,739 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,845,930 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 23.6%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hmong | Immigrants from Hong Kong | 
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.3% | 
| Maximum | 33.3% | 18.6% | 
| Range | 30.8% | 17.3% | 
| Mean | 13.9% | 9.4% | 
| Median | 13.2% | 9.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 7.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 10.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 3.4% | 
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (13.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195  | Fair 13.7%  | 
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196  | Fair 13.7%  | 
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197  | Fair 13.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198  | Fair 13.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199  | Fair 13.8%  | 
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200  | Fair 13.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201  | Fair 13.9%  | 
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202  | Fair 13.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203  | Fair 13.9%  | 
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204  | Poor 13.9%  | 
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205  | Poor 14.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206  | Poor 14.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 11.5%  |