Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
50.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,630,543 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 18.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 31.3% | 38.6% |
| Range | 24.1% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 18.1% |
| Median | 12.4% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Celtic (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
| South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |