Hungarian vs Immigrants from Norway Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Immigrants from Norway
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
Immigrants from Norway
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
39.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Norway Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,502,236 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,651,083 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 1.5%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 6.0% | 9.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 65.2% |
Range | 94.0% | 55.4% |
Mean | 31.6% | 25.7% |
Median | 22.7% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.1% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.1% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.8% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and Immigrants from Norway by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and European (21.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |