Cherokee vs Immigrants from Australia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Cherokee
 Immigrants from Australia
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Australia
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Australia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,388,222 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 42.8%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Australia | 
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.93% | 
| Maximum | 21.8% | 21.9% | 
| Range | 19.8% | 21.0% | 
| Mean | 7.0% | 5.0% | 
| Median | 6.6% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 6.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.9% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.94%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 4.4%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163  | Good 3.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164  | Good 3.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165  | Good 3.0%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166  | Good 3.0%  |