Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Russian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Russian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Russians
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Russian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,917,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.25%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Russian |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 75.4% |
| Range | 19.7% | 74.4% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 9.5% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |