Immigrants from England vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 384,555,276 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.425% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 425.2 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $42,563, a difference of 14.8%), median household income ($92,098 compared to $80,972, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $89,969, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $49,039, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $37,383, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.86%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 7.1%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.4%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.040%), 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.0%).